zte axon mini video

Llion people learn the language? By convincing them to learn the language. That is the tricky part. That is what make Esperanto easier for the people who study it. Zte axon 7 cheap They want to learn and it is for that reason they make the time and put the effort. That is true because there is not practical, monetary benefit attached to learning Esperanto. With other languages, including English, many people study it because they want to learn it for the sake of it, for those becoming proficient is just a matter of time. However, many others study English for the perceived, real or imaginary according to the specific case, practical or monetary benefits.

They do not want to learn the language for the sake of it but for an expected benefit. For these learning will be more difficult.

Latest firmware zte axon mini video

And now, why I advocate English over Esperanto. There is a lot more interest worldwide to learn English than to learn Esperanto, for whatever reasons.

There is a larger benefit package associated with learning English than with Esperanto, in the short and long term. The benefits do not go away with time; they just continue to grow for some or level off for others. There is a considerably larger amount of people that already speak English, some better than others.

Original software zte axon mini video

There is a very small amount of people that already speak Esperanto, again some better than others. A much larger initial investment is needed to take Esperanto to the position of World Lingua Franca than with English.

There is a lot more already invested in English infrastructure. There are a lot more people learning English, voluntarily and without the need of government subsidies, than there are Esperanto students.

Original software zte axon mini video

There are a lot more countries with English as their de facto or official language. English is already used as a communication means in most aspects of interaction among countries.

Esperanto is easier to learn than English. English is easier to learn than most other languages.

Include Custom zte axon mini video

Esperanto grammar is easy, English grammar is easier than most other grammars. Esperanto pronunciation is regular and predictable, English pronunciation on the other hand is a bitch. Time and, generalized and standardized instruction will keep Esperanto pronunciation and grammar with little change, but will help regularize English pronunciation and probably simplify is grammar a little more. A now some numbers.

There are over one thousand million people that already speak English to a certain level. There is less than 3 million Esperanto speaker that already speak Esperanto to a certain level. There are trillions of dollars (or Euros if you wish) already invested in English infrastructure. There is little, almost not existing by comparison, investment in Esperanto infrastructure.

Features zte axon mini video

There are more people starting to learn English for the first time, every year, than the totality of the existing Esperanto speakers, just in China. And I can continue but it becomes boring after a while. So yes, I agree with you. Esperanto is a very good solution. If you are honest with yourself then you will have to agree with me that English is a much better solution.

In the short term and in the long term. And once the goal is attained and every person in the World speak the same language the costs of maintenance are not much different. And the perceived, real or not, advantage that English native speakers are supposed to have will simply vanish.

Opinions and reviews zte axon mini video

Discrimination is a human thing, not a language thing, it will exist regardless of the language used, and will continue even after every person speak the same language. That is a different problem requiring a different solution.

Taking advantage of one position against others is a human thing and will continue regardless of the language spoken, it requires a different solution. The rest is just politics, so people pick their side based on their views. With the world becoming a global village, more people than ever need the most efficient communication method.

Operations manager zte axon mini video

There is no comparable precedent situation. French was the favoured language for people of my generation.

You will reply that the situation changed. That is just the strong point of Esperanto.

By adding one at a time and stopping denigrating the language (Thanks for not doing that)5) there is no practical, monetary benefit attached to learning Esperanto. This is not a commercial enterprise contrarily to English.

BTW the French were at the time. Now they changed their mind and want to keep French for themselves. E-ists want to keep their mother language evolving its own way. Being international justifies some sacrifices :-)Actually, if you go back you will see I have said the same in more than one occasion.

Now, demagoguery is easy to spot. No I am not stepping backward, although in some cases it may be necessary and useful, this is not one of those. They both do exactly the same. Like for example CD and USB drives. One is flashy, permanent and almost eternal and unbreakable.

So they go for the second one. Popularity will take one down the road of success. In our case, English despite all its detractor and critics is way more popular than Esperanto.

People consider it more useful. Or financially speaking, people believe there is a greater likelihood they will get a return on their investment.

French was it at one time. And pardon for disagreeing, but English has always been a competitor to French, being mortal enemies from way before they were civilized. In commerce, English quickly became more important and then came other aspects of human life, finance, industry, etc. And things continued to change, in favor of English.

Because Esperanto is always portrayed as easy to learn, of having an easy grammar, and a great vocabulary, easily mastered because of word derivation. But, still, you need time. Different people need different amount of time. Different people will attain different fluency level, depending on their needs and desires.

That is exactly what I tell my students. English is easy to learn, the grammar is easy, easier than most, great vocabulary, words roots from all over the cultural spectrum.

Pronunciation is difficult but easier than many other important languages. And thing continued to change in favor of English.

Those are the word of an Esperantist. However, Esperantists constantly try to denigrate English as a mean of gaining adepts for their cause. I am not denying there is gains to be made from teaching English, and people is Ok with that because they are studying English so they can get some benefits too, monetary and otherwise, now, in this moment, not for my great-great-great-grandchildren, but for me. That is the appeal of English.

That is why things continue to change in favor of English. I do not deny there is a concerted effort to push people toward English.

Although not as much form governments as it used to be, today is more from individuals trying to make a buck from the perception of utility of English. Are you denying that there is a concerted effort to guide people toward Esperanto?

There is even and International Movement to take Esperanto to the masses. Esperanto has more organizations for the promotion of Esperanto than English, in comparison.

And I can accept the good things about Esperanto, how come that Esperantists cannot accept the goods thing about English? Because that will help the continuation of change in English favor. Discrimination is bad and it need to be resolved.

So is inequality and wealth distribution (now I am sounding like you;-) But is it NOT a language thing and it will be not cured with the adoption of a particular language. People can and will be discriminated against in Esperanto as well, despite the original ideology and all other Manifestos in between.

That is why American English is so different from English 200 years ago and from English in England. They did not have any control on how the language evolved.

Once other people started to emigrate and started to learn English, and people from other parts of