zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

Soon as the next superpower imposed its own rules. Today we are beginning to have a glimpse of what a globalized world could mean. Nations and superpowers are taking note. For the first time in a century of English prevalence, the global reality we are stepping in is clearly showing us that communication is no longer possible on the scale of a single language like English. Reality is multilingual and translation, even computer assisted, is not enough to ensure transfer of knowledge. Zte axon 7 cheap This is particularly critical in scientific research, where excellent scientific discoveries are emerging in non-English languages. Countless ideas and innovations could be lost unless we find a better way of communication between linguistic communities (M. Cyberspace is definitely multilingual. The world is multilingual.

This may be the beginning of the end of the dominant languages. Turning English into a lingua franca without adopting American or British culture is perfectly doable.

Original software zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

You speak Elvish, if that is your choice. Stop this silent bullying that favors people speaking English and discriminates the rest. The world needs tools to enable people of different languages to communicate in a right and effective way. Internet is one of those tools, as well as translation.

A dominant language is not. Cyberspace is multilingual because the world is multilingual; it always was. Hopefully the age of dominant languages will soon be over, as Internet is beginning to show. I am for a neutral artificial language, but I think Esperanto is a BAD idea. A text written in Esperanto looks awful, as a bad parody of Italian. I would really suggest Interlingua.

Startup zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

It looks like Spanish, but is shaped by English speaking people. It is good, as it wwas mentioned here in the forum, the only truly international languages spoken in the EU are Spanish and English.

Neither Spanish nor English are international languages. They are national languages, intended for communication among people who speak them as native languages.

Wipe Drives zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

The fact they are used internationally does not make them international languages. They remain as what they are, national languages, no matter how much we try to use them as international languages.

A national language with dominant position is just a dominant language, not an international one. Violence, no matter if physical, psychological, social, economical or historical-related, should never be a valid argument for an international language. I thought it was? All Europeans should be able to communicate.

Startup zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

In countries such as Spain, Germany, Italy many have problems communicating! EU is an ALLIANCE (primary economic) of 28 SOVEREIGN COUNTRIES, not some Anglo-Saxon Empire!

Polish is about to be dropped ys an examination language in UK which is madness. Why do those kids in the picture have the Union Flag on their bags. Surely if any flag is to be used to represent the English language it should be the English Flag. Should learning English as a foreign language be mandatory for all students in Europe?

Portable rus zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

Why does it have to be mandatory? There are other things that curtail the exchange of information and knowledge such as religious and political beliefs.

Shall we then make religion and political views mandatory? Do we have too many lawyers looking into the problem?

Last update zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

For whom a solution to any problem is a new law? There are other things that curtail the exchange of information and knowledge such as religious and political beliefs, access to the actual information, financial means to attend the necessary education institutions. English, German or French, since the 3 of them are working languages at institutional level. Choosing just English sounds a bit arbitrary to me. All equipments inthe eastern side of the globe are in english.

Also: chinese for the future! So, of course, english should be compulsory at school but not imposed after a certain age. The richness of Europe is made by all his languages, and i consider a huge mistake thinking that once you learn language you can live anywhere.

Original software zte axon 7 vs galaxy note 7

Definitely english should be the second language taught in schools, firstly because we europeans need to be able to communicate with each other, secondly because english is the most widely spoken second language in the EU and thirdly, because most of the world accepts english as lingua franca of our age. ESPERANTO Wake up Everybody. Just a Common Sense vehicle language like a credit card and NO linguistic Imperialism.

People are STUPIDWe will see if Britain stays in the Union. If it is not joining the Eurozone, it is best to learn Italian, French, Spanish, and German. We could teach English as a form of development assistance for mono-lngual Brits if the nation decides to stay. I think a second language should be mandatory anyway.

It would make it more simple and useful for all nations of Europe, if English would be taught as second language. Seriously, I think that few students nowadays do not study at least a few years of English as part of their education.

Your idea is better than one language. I would choose English, Spanish and Russian although I know that Russian is not official in any country of the European Union. Mandatory is not any more a need, computers can translate anything our days. Also, people express themselves better using their home language.

Why to not learn to use it much better!! More quality education needs.. I know the idea sounds crazy, but it might work. We should learn one germanic, one romance and one slavic.

Europe is rich in languages and it would be non-sense to learn only English as a foreign language, specially when it seems that a part of the UK is not very interested in being part of the EU. If you want a European language, you are now writing It! English is European as it is British! A former Germanic dialect with considerable French and Latin influence is after all, as European as it Gets! I am Romanian, therefore I am a native speaker of a Latin language, but still, I believe English is the most comprehensible and European there is As for Esperanto, Latin or a new one, I think complicating communication will not help in building an united Europe.

Almost no one would learn it, the existing lingua franca is the most fit for the Europe of tomorrow! Esperanto would not complicate communication, but would enormously simplify it. And some Esperanto words are the same as Romanian.

Absolutely, the only way for us all to speak one language and get on step closer to unity! UK is not very interested in EU now, but in the future there is chance that they will change their views. Anyway, language and politics are two different issues. Without a common language, most people face their adult working life at a disadvantage…….

The major drawback of English is that it gives a large, permanent and unearned advantage to native speakers of English. English, as the first language of some can never be a second language for everbody.

There are almost one thousand million people who already speak English to a certain level. Which is way more than the alternative some are advocating here. It is their choice. They should study more. But I agree with Bianca some better methods of teaching languages in general, and specially English as a second language, are necessary.

So the major drawback of teaching English as a second language is also going to be a major drawback of teaching any other language. Most people will decide that what they have learned is enough and stop before reaching the level of proficiency that is really going to help them. And that is in spite of all the superior economic incentives that learning English offer compared to other languages.

Apart from being many times easier than English, and thus an encouragement to weaker language learners, it is a better preparation for subsequent language learning. Admittedly, it is based on European roots, but is far less Latin-based than the uninitiated think. But at two deeper levels, it resembles 1) Hungarian, Finnish and