zte axon 7 paris

Experience of millions of Europeans who suffered communism, but you have not taken the time to really try to find out what it was about. So much for critical thinking. Carlos, For the sake of all of us in this forum, please reread your entries or have someone edit them for grammaticality before posting. It is excrutiating trying to read your somewhat incoherent sentences. I have encountered this type of writing in my high school classes and I always make a point of helping my students better their communicativity. Zte axon 7 cheap In this forum that is hardly possible. Carlos, just in case you ran through school when they were teaching English, calling somebody only by their last name is offensive except in the armed forces. Once again you denude you ignorance of English pragmatics.

But since you claim to be so proficient in Standard American English, I did not read further since you willfully chose to insult me with your introduction. Robb KvasnakKvasnak, you are so full of it that you are bursting at the seams. Stop reviewing my posts and review yours before you post them. At least I have the excuse that I am, according to you, a simpleminded, uneducated, unarticulated individual.

Features zte axon 7 paris

I have pointed them out. Why do you not show mine? And it is good to know that you understand enough to be offended. But you should read the rest so you realize all the rubbish you are bestowing your good friends with. When the British Empire was beginning to be overtaken by the American Empire, in 1943, Churchill made a speech at Harvard which was enthusiastically received by Americans, for he pointed out that there was a way of colonising countries without force of arms, by spreading the use of English as an international language.

People on the other hand will. A gun is just a gun and as such it will do no harm. Catholicism is just a religion created to supposedly spread the word of a non-existing God, but the message was good, and peaceful. As such it will do you not harm. Islam is just a religion, based on the same God, with a very similar message, with a good and peaceful intension.

Information: zte axon 7 paris

As such it will do you no harm. Esperanto is just a language created as an international means of communication. The intentions of its creator were good, altruistic and peaceful.

Do not blame the tool for how its owner uses it. It is just a tool and as such it will do you no harm. National-socialism was supposed to be peaceful and for the good of the people. Communism is a beautiful philosophy, and was supposed to be good for the masses and its aim was to liberate the World of exploitative Capitalism.

Public release zte axon 7 paris

People will use anything they can to harm other people. If they do not have something, then they will invent it. And excuse me for being so extensive but your empty rhetorical led me to believe you were not getting the message.

I hope that I was of help. The World is not the same as 50 years ago. And people are becoming better every day. If people do not change, then if Esperanto is adopted as the World Lingua Franca it too will be used to harm other people. If you truly believe that Esperanto can be used to unite the World and make it a better place it is not because Esperanto is magical and will change people.

How to update zte axon 7 paris

It is because you believe that people can change for the better and finally use something for its intended purpose and not to harm others. People will do that, not Esperanto!

If that can be done with Esperanto then it can be done with English, or French, or Spanish or any other language because PEOPLE WILL DO IT not the language. If it cannot be done with English, or French, or Spanish or any other language, then it cannot be done with Esperanto.

Startup zte axon 7 paris

Now, dissect that and come up a few more nonsensical slogans. Slogans too can be used to do harm because people will use them to do harm. I dare you to refute that. If the message still is too difficult to understand because English is so illogical, then you can ask Dr. Kvasnak (he does not like to be called by his last name, it offends him) to translate the message to Esperanto, after all he has a doctorate in the English language and I imagine he will be able to decipher my horribly bad compositions skills (I ran through school when they were teaching English).

Once the message has been impeccably translated by our friend the Dr. There is nothing wrong with Esperanto, there is nothing wrong with French, there is nothing wrong with Spanish, there is nothing wrong with any of the thousands of languages in the World if they were to be used as the World Lingua Franca. But each and every one of them can be used, and have been used, to do harm, because people will use them to do harm. I never said that Esperanto cannot be used to unite the World and make it a better place. I just said that English too can be used for that purpose, and that based on the present World situation it will be easier, quicker and less expensive to do it with English.

Public release zte axon 7 paris

And everybody will be better because of it. And the World will be a better place because of it. For the betterment of Mankind and the World! Yours truly Alejandro Carlos, B. Since then, England has used a lot of resources to increase the influence of its language, that was thought ill-suited for international diplomacy. The return on investment is poor. Must we consider this as a failureTake a look at my answer to Robb. The October Revolution triumph was newly minted and they were already showing their dark side. France was still a world power (militarily) with many colonies (few of which amount to much after a century has passed).

The World was at it most violent point while French was the language of diplomacy. WWI was entirely a European thing. So much for diplomacy.

Popular zte axon 7 paris

The British did everything in their power to come on top, so did Germany, France, Spain, etc. Regarding the return on the investment, are you actually saying that the return on the investment with English was poor? Little England begot: The USA, Australia, New Zealand, Canada just to mention a few. What did France, Germany, Spain, Italy, etc. A failure of diplomacy. But my point is that whether I am in agreement with all that or not. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LANGUAGE.

It was an entirely human thing, it would have happened the same way if other languages were spoken by the same players. So do not kill the messenger!

Look forward to the future, it looks better and brighter than ever before. I am going to learn Esperanto all over again! So that I can enlighten those Esperantists that still do not know the true. It will be better with English!

I am sure you can teach us a lot. You just gave us your opinion. I hoped to see something new in the interventions in this forum, but I found little worth adding.

And again you convinced me. Maybe that is why there still are only a handful of Esperanto speakers. Definitely so much worse. Going to another country and finding an Esperanto speaker, fortuitously, is akin to winning the Lotto Big Prize. For sure the chances of knowing the World through Esperanto are so much better.

And I do not want to talk about culture because it is so embarrassing how many more contributions have been made to World culture in Esperanto than in English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, Chinese, etc. People in their ignorance do not realize they can learn Esperanto in a couple of weeks and be fully bilingual in another 3 or 4 weeks more. And then they can go out into the World and get a very well paid and rewarding job, that not only will make their life better but that will provide enough discretionary income to travel the whole World and learn about it by talking with all those Esperanto speakers scattered throughout the World. You keep harping on the same string. And no, I do not read the same propaganda twice. It already was a waste of time the first time. There is a severe problem with obligatory ideological homogeneity of liberalism, especially manifested as hatred of anything and anyone conservative, especially conservative Chri