zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

K and Germany have been fighting each other for centuries. Do they trust each other? Only as far as they have no choice. Very few people speak Esperanto. Zte axon 7 cheap That is why she writes that English is the best tool to communicate. There are millions of people in every continent who speak English and that she can communicae with. In every country, people to communicate with, and talk with and argue with, about politics and economy and social issues and even about how there is a minuscule group of people that speak a funny language who think the language they learned, which is not their native language, is a better choice for communication despite that very few people speak it, and that there is no economic, financial, social or political benefit of learning it. BUT, very many people know about English, and that if they learn English they will have more opportunities and a better chance of making more money and have a better life. That is true in the US and the UK, that is also true in Europe and in Africa, and in Asia, and in Polinesia, and in Central and South America. And if the peguins could talk and read the newpaper that would also be true in Antartica.

No more English threatening diversity as the single official language of a diverse Europe! No Europe values at all. Hey, if you do know, show me any other congress where this kind of miracle happens.

Wipe Drives zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

When you tell them about a new friend, they never ask questions about what really matters. They do not really care. They only care about the possibilities the language offers them. Possibilities of improving their economic status, of being able of getting off the poverty treadmill, of giving their progeny a better education and future.

And yes numbers matter. How do you explain to someone not making enough to make ends meet that they should not care about how much money they can make when they learn English but instead that they should learn Esperanto, which is not going to offer anything in return right now but that in ten generations will make the World a better place. How many days will that person go hungry before he or she stops caring.

Last update zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

Numbers have always mattered. That is how democracy is supposed to work, by the wish, and for the benefit, of the majority.

And unfortunately for the Esperanto advocates, presently English carries the majority. Maybe in the next election Esperanto will have a majority vote, although that is unlikely giving the strength of all the other runner ups. Chinese, Spanish, Russian, German, French, etc. Even Hindi and Polynesian have a better chance given the number of speakers.

Public release zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

Numbers matter and Democracy is a bitch when it does not work your way. Well, you cannot be pro democracy only when it benefits you. So be democratic and go with the majority. We are counting on you to vote yes. See, iand millions of speakers plus supporters are like those who proposed the metric system no one used first (0 users), you are like those who wanted other to still use the measure system of the greatest empire.

Against History trends, the metric system is finally everywhere (well, in the USA, China people still use their own, yet the metric one as the bridge one). So… If we all keep on using ilogically the biggest language as the bridge one, then you are right, Esperanto has way less chances, but if we once and for all agree using ethics and brains… You are totally wrong. Who benefits most of English as the bridge language?

Wipe Drives zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

Who benefits somehow and unefficiently right now? Real democracy is the one where citizens are objectively well informed of all options. The metric system adoption was not like what we are presently discussing.

The metric systems was adopted by consensus because of its obvious benefits to the parties involved. Although, it was not without opposition nor was it universally accepted, even to this day. Personally, I am not advocating that English be forced upon people who do not want to use it, nor stating that it should be established as the sole language of all the countries of the EU. There are over 20 countries in the EU and there are 24 official languages.

Popular zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

That means that every piece of legislation have to be translated into all official languages. It means there are delegates that (even if they speak English) require translators and interpreters to perform their duties.

Infrastructure has to be created to accommodate all languages, etc. Presently, English is already present in most of the EU activities. It is being used by most delegates as the mean to communicate with one another and a great deal of the necessary infrastructure is already in place for English.

Operations manager zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

There is nothing for Esperanto and only a handful of delegates speak the language, if any. Those numbers presently translate in Euros that have to be spent to implement the adopted measures. Since the beginning of this argument I stated that the sensible thing to do was to take this question to the people of all the member countries in their own native languages, as a referendum, and to let the majority decide what they think it is the best course of action.

Once they cast their vote their decision must be accepted, whatever that decision may be. That is the democratic way. Inform the people and let them decide. There are many that will shout the masses are always wrong. I am not one of those, not when the masses are truly and correctly informed.

How to update zte axon 7 kiedy w polsce

First, it is de facto the language being already used in that capacity, second, it is the nonnative language spoken by the greatest number of people in the EU, third, from the financial, economic, scientific, technical and social point of view is the language most used within and without the EU. Which is why it is already widely used in the high spheres of the EU. Culturally, everybody will continue to use their own language for many generations to come, whether the Union likes it or not. Despite the fact that those cultural differences are what have given Europe its bloody and violent history. Regarding the people in general and their relation with English, it is mostly a personal one. Many people hate the language, wrongly, because they take it to represent whatever their opinion of the US and the UK is. Even those who have benefited from learning and using English but bear ill sentiments for those countries.

Sentiments based on their experiences and ideals. I cannot and do not disagree with their right to think as they do. And I agree with all of them that they also have a right to use a different language if they so decide.

Even if it is Esperanto, it is still their right to choose. But to state, as some people have been doing in here, that Esperanto is a better choice for the majority, just because it is supposed to be easier and cheaper to teach to future generations and because it does not represent any particular country and will not interfere with their language and their culture is at best naive and at worse a deliberate deception.

Their cultures and their languages will be affected regardless what language is chosen, maybe not in the short term but in the long haul the adoption of just one official language for the EU will affect all countries more profoundly, and in my opinion for the better, than it is being let known. Once one language is adopted the first requirement will be that all schools, in all member countries, mandatorily teach that language as a second language, if for no other reason, so the population at large understand the laws and the government activities. That will affect every aspect of life in those countries.

I am going to stipulate that you know more about Esperanto than I do. You should since you are saying it ought to be adopted instead of English. But I know that there are very few people that speak the language worldwide, in comparison.

I also know there is no infrastructure for the language in the EU, or in any other part of the world for that matter. It is also true that in comparison the amount of information in every field of know