zte axon 7 hk

D to know Christa. At least you are a little more honest than most Esperanto advocates here who want you to believe you could be a complete Esperanto speaker in about a few weeks. Which is simply not possible. Then again, your definition of very proficient may be different to mine. Very proficient in my understanding is not just to be able to comfortably talk about the weather and things like that but a thorough knowledge of the language that will allow you to understand almost any topic and be able to talk, write and read at the highest levels. Zte axon 7 cheap If that is your case, congrats! Now, do not get me wrong, I have never contended that Esperanto is easier to learn. Ideals a very nice, although they not always turn out to be all that they were claimed to be and they do not work as promised most of the time, as History very annoyingly keeps reminding us. But the most important point of my argument has always been that presently most people will choose English over Esperanto, or even many other languages over Esperanto, because it will give them an immediate benefit, or at least the possibility of one, whereas Esperanto will not. It is a lot easier to increase your income and well being by adding English to your skill set than to do the same with Esperanto. That is what people want. More money, better life. NOWEsperanto may do that but years from now with English it will be a lot more immediate.

Additionally, if you do with English everything that Esperanto advocates propose should be done with Esperanto the benefits will maximize and everybody will be much better, much sooner. My proposition has always been that once we agree to make a language universal then it will be taught everywhere, at all level of education, from elementary to University, that will remove all the difficulties of learning English as a second language and will make everybody proficient like a native.

How to install zte axon 7 hk

Once everybody is learning English they will have a lot more people to practice with, understanding and pronunciation will improve everywhere, teaching methods will become more efficient and all of that could be achieved in just a few years. And people learning English will have from the get go over a billion people to communicate with, millions of books to read and all the other benefits that are associated with knowing your own language and English. Forget the Americans and the Brits and all others, they will NOT have any advantage when everybody speak English well. And for those that say that it is very difficult to get to the proficiency level of the likes of Cameron, Obama, etc. And yes it is very difficult and it will be very difficult to attain a similar level in Esperanto, even if it is easier by comparison.

Simply put, Esperanto may be an easier, more regular and predictable language, BUT, and that is a big but, people go the English because it offers them more, NOW. Now what you Esperanto advocates have to do is to explain to us, in simple and practical terms, without any idealism or politics, how can Esperanto, presently spoken by less than two million out of 7 thousand million, with most of those people not even knowing what Esperanto is, offer a better, easier, cheaper and quicker fix to our present day problems. I know you say it will solve all of our problems in about 100 years but I and millions of others are not going to be around then so that solution is no good to us. The Esperanto ALPHABET is PHONETIC with 28 letters.

Opinions and reviews zte axon 7 hk

In Esperanto EACH LETTER IS PRONOUNCED AND ALWAYS REPRESENTS THE SAME SOUND. There are more new Chinese students starting to learn English every year than the total amount of Esperanto speakers in the whole World. Despite Esperanto being easier and English being confusing and all the other disadvantages you have enumerated. What does that do? Does it change anything?

Will there be more people willing to learn Esperanto just because I said it is easier than English? Most words in English are accented in the penultimate syllable.

Last update zte axon 7 hk

There are many accented in a different syllable. The variation in the position of the stressed syllable gives color and musicality to the language.

Maybe that is why people do not like Esperanto. It is to monotonous, to boring.

Public release zte axon 7 hk

Verbs: In English: 283 irregular verbs; in Esperanto: NONE. Conjugation In English:variable root; in Esperanto: INVARIABLEWell, just teach everybody Esperanto, sit down and wait. Ten years later you will have a very different language. The only problem is that people really do not want to waste their time learning Esperanto.

IDENTIFICATION OF THE GRAMMATICAL FUNCTION: English: confused, many grammatical relations are unexpressed Esperanto CLEAR AND IMMEDIATE SYNTAX: in English rigid fixed word order; in Esperanto very subtleWhat is wrong with a confusing grammar, most languages have one and millions of people speak them with no problem. Wells; professor of English language phonetics at University College London.

Installed Programs zte axon 7 hk

If you want to use two words use two word, if you want to use three use three otherwise learn German. This used to be called a very rich language, it gives nuance to the spoken word. Esperanto does not have it because it is a non living language.

It have never been used in the daily lives of millions of people intent on giving new meaning to old words. A mass unit than most people in the world today do not know. What is it today? Esperanto have been around about 150 years and have been spoken by a very small amount of people, people who do not use the language in their day to day but just to communicate with others like them, to practice the language because they do not have any other way of doing it. It always happens, Spanish is a more or less controlled language with a regulatory body recognized by all the people who speak the language, now talk to me about the Spanish of Mexico, Cuba, Argentina, Chile, Peru, etc. That in the long run is unavoidable. People is like that. They will take a word and use it for something else. French has a less logical spelling, but it is more logical than the English spelling: a group of vowels (au, oeu, ai, …) is always pronounced the same way, not so in English, as I already showed here about ea. Measures in favor of greater justice always oppose the interests of powerful groups which do everything to keep their privileges.

How to update zte axon 7 hk

Moreover, humankind always resists non-technical, non-material innovations that make everyday life easier and are the fruit of human creativity, probably because people do not easily change deep rooted habits. XLIX using only Roman numerals, you will see) and Esperanto with Arabic numerals, who are much easier to operate.

However, had an extra-terrestrial come to research the Earth then, it would quickly be convinced that the whole world would eventually adopt the Arabic numerals. A second example: the metric system.

Original software zte axon 7 hk

It was proposed in 1647. A century later, only a few experts knew about it. But today almost the whole world uses it. The US continues to stick to its old units of length and weight, but it is an exception. If you compare the Roman numerals, the US system of weights and measures, and the use of English on one hand with the Arabic numerals, the metric system and Esperanto on the other, you notice that the latter share several positive characteristics: they are overall quicker to learn, their use is easier, they are more consistent, and they are more democratic.

When only the Roman numerals were in use, only mathematicians were able to multiply and divide. The Arabic numerals placed calculation at the disposal of craftsmen, farmers and children.

This noticably progressed the democratisation of society. A little bit exaggerated in its putting down of the English language and its praise of Esperanto.

But then again you are an Esperanto activist. Roman numerals were limited in scope. They never got to very high numbers, they never needed them. The slowness in the adoption of the metric system by the Americans is not due to its lack of me