zte axon 7 where to buy

Governments of those nations take advantage of that endorsing English as way to get more money and thus more power. Why bother about others or the future, right? To my knowledge, you were the first person in this discussion that mentioned that Esperanto has no native speakers as an important argument against it. You lost that argument. And it is not so important, just another evidence that it is alive. Zte axon 7 cheap Is Robert your real name, or is it a made up one? I have not tried to compare English to Esperanto, I just pointed out what was wrong with the comparisons being made by others regarding how much better Esperanto was than English. And the questions are not redundant, in any case they are rhetorical. That is why I understand perfectly well why they are so difficult for you to answer honestly.

And you can believe me when I tell you that, in the middle of the glorious Roman Empire, I would have never advised anybody to learn English. It was not useful to get ahead. Like it was not too useful in Europe in the middle of the French cultural rule nor in the Soviet bloc in the middle of the glorious Soviet era. But nowadays, even the Frenchmen and the Russians are learning English, go figure.

Startup zte axon 7 where to buy

I am not going to deny that it will make it easier for them to sell their products, but that is something that the others already want, their products. In the other hand, it will make it a lot more easier to sell them (to those you do not want them to get a greater advantage because more people will speak their language) their products (those of the people learning English).

But that is the way things are and people do not really want to learn English to give the native speakers an advantage but to increase their opportunities and improve their own situation. It is your political blindness what make you not see the benefits that English as a common language will bring to those who learn it. You just want to screw the US and the UK. Esperanto will do that, I mean screw the US and the UK, but so it will everybody else. And yes, everybody is looking for an edge (including Esperantists), that is why the want to learn English (and that is why Esperantists are so vehemently trying to sell the idea that Esperanto is better).

Opinions and reviews zte axon 7 where to buy

That is human nature. But it is undeniable that one language will make things better for all countries in the EU, we agree on that. We only disagree on which language.

You propose Esperanto which might be easier to learn but does not offer any benefit in the short or medium term, and that almost EVERYBODY will have to learn from scratch, and that everything will have to be translated into it. Or, English, which is the one I believe has a better change of succeeding, although not necessarily proposing it personally. A language that is spoken by the larger amount of people as a second language, in Europe.

Features zte axon 7 where to buy

Into which most of the things are already translated. And I am sorry but I do not have too much time so I will have to cut this short, one last thing, though.

Those kids did not just happen to learn Esperanto it was with premeditation and aforethought that their parents forced them to learn it. I will accept the motives of those who tried to create an Esperanto state, unsuccessful as they were. They have several good and selfish reasons to want Esperanto to be the language of their newly formed state, regardless of whether other people wanted to learn it. But unfortunately, they did not succeed and Esperanto did not become a national language, one which kids born there will have to learn regardless their parents wishes, nor did it become a changing living language used in the daily life of people who did not have any other choice. Should English be the only official language of the EU? Ou encore: devrait-on instaurer la dictature officielle du tout-anglais?

Startup zte axon 7 where to buy

Chu la angla devus esti la unika oficiala lingvo de la U. Chu oni devus do novstarigi la oficialan diktaturon de la tuta-angla? La rezisto kontrau la diktaturo de la tuta-angla tuj organizighus. La oficiala tuta-angla logike entenus la finon de la E. La politikistoj kiuj vochdonus tiun-chi leghon estus neniam plu elektitaj kaj neniam plu vivus en sia lando. La franca kaj la germana estas pli parolatj ol la angla en la Europa Unio. Ankorau pli se la Anglio elirus de la E. Esperanto, justa kaj facila internacia lingvo, por plibonigi la lingvan demokration , devus esti aldonita kiel PLIA oficiala lingvo KUN la 25 aliaj lingvoj.

Is spoken in India, im China, im the arab world, so make it compulsory in E. It makes sense as it is the most widely spoken language in the world. Most people know it, so it just seems more practical. Official Language of the EU.. It is already actually.

Last update zte axon 7 where to buy

Even if you disagree. You even argue against it — in English!

English is already the de facto language of Science, not only in EU, but in the whole world. Declaring an Official Language in the EU is Unnecessary — and Un-European. Is this proposal in accordance with the Treaty on European Union? See the article 4. In particular, national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State. The CIA and MI6 will both be pushing English.

Installed Programs zte axon 7 where to buy

Since the end of the Cold War Esperanto was dumbed down by mysterious people within the Esperanto organisations. When I researched this ten years ago the President of Esperanto Association of Britain led a public attack on me at the following AGM. He had been posing as a friend and colleague for many years, but I had failed to notice the obvious; he was working for the British Council.

The whole history of the Esperanto movement is rich in such attacks from within. First they came from the French speakers, then from the English speakers.

How to install zte axon 7 where to buy

The spread of English was manufactured. The NSA and the British Council even held meetings around 1960 to plan for the hegemony of English.

If people only understood that, and experienced Esperanto in practice, they would overwhelmingly support Esperanto. In 1960 black people were still riding in the back of the bus, today we have a black President.

There was still apartheid in South Africa, then came Mandela. People change, countries change, more often for the better.

Esperanto was created over 150 years ago, it may have been a good idea then. It may even be a good idea today, but please stop using 60, 40, 20 years old reasons to justify your position. This is the wrong side of globalisation …

Those are two very different questions. Everyone who wants to be understood use english at the moment all over the world. How much time must take till any other language will be spoken by any other nation?

In the case of national languages, a very long time. In the case of Esperanto it could be quite quick. If China were to decide to teach Esperanto in all its schools, then in two or three years there would be a substantial number of Esperanto speaking school leavers in China, and all those who trade with China would have to take note, because learning Esperanto is a lot easier than learning Chinese of English. Any language teacher would be able to teach himself Esperanto in a matter of weeks, so a whole education system could be introducing Esperanto within a year. The rest of the population would learn Esperanto very quickly if they needed it. I think it is sensible if everyone would at least learn English to the intermediate level as it is the easiest to learn and comprehend language in Europe.

But along with english, French and German and Spanish must be taught to the same level to everyone. The only people who like this idea are the ones too lazy to learn any other language.

This will be a shame for us. On the contrary the influence of English should be lowered! The only official language of Europe?

Greek should be as all the languages have within Greek words and Greek routes. English is the mother tounge of no more than 65 M people…

German is spoken by not less than 100M people.. The EU needs one common official language.

It is not that important which one it would