zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

Y for a long time within EU. Furtermore although English seems to be one of the easiest languages to learn it takes too much time to master it. There are millions of people around who have taken courses for long years and still they are unable to speak. Within two years of Esperanto teaching we might have Esperanto speakers that are double the amount of English speakers within EU. Zte axon 7 cheap An easy to learn, European, neutral and providing equal rights and possibilities to every one. What about creating universal artificial language like esperanto, but more worldwide range? English is for english people. I am learning your language because I travelled there during and after esperanto meetings. I went already 3 times there. It does mean that cultural diversity will be lost. We only managed to import some of our culture into our version of English.

There have been no native speakers of Irish in my family since those born around 1850. Even so I do not feel that my native language, English, is my language. As a British person who speaks a minority language (Welsh) within the UK, this question is pretty tricky…

Latest firmware zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

(not least because it was learnt alongside Arabic and French. I still think it would be a shame to speak English at the expense of other languages.

Surely, our society is sufficiently progressive to find space for all languages? But hey… make me king of the EU. Language is about thinking, cultural expression and diversity.

Include Custom zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

The UK is a small, insignificant island from a mainland European perspective, not in any sense an integral part of European culture. Although in many European countries people learn English, they almost overwhelmingly dislike it (with such exceptions as Luxembourg or The Baltic).

The EU (and the UN) is a predominantly FRENCH idea, and France is the arch enemy of England and English. I agree that the EU needs a common language.

Public release zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

However, it would be a missed opportunity to choose English for this role. For example, 6 years of French in school and my classmates could barely speak a sentence. What about the mediterranean lingua Franca also called Sabir? Paradoxically, if the UK left the EU, the status of English as a neutral language would be enhanced!

In fact, English already is the default working language of the EU: FR and DE translations lag the EN documents after important meetings for example. Even France has superceded its notorious loi Toubon for the loi Fioroso, which permits English to be used in many teaching contexts (a big change).

Opinions and reviews zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

Why should this be? Consider that in 1950, the 6 founding countries of what would become the EU spoke 4 languages between them (FR, DE, NL, IT). Which was just about do-able. But if each of the 24 official languages of the contemporary EU were to have theoretically equal status, each language would have 23 translation pairs, so 552 different kinds of translator would be required. Beautiful as the French language may be, the whole gender thing is an arbitrary mess for little gain which English (wisely) long ago abandoned.

The learning and use of this language affects the thought, the way one looks at the world. A lot of people are working on other sytems, using esperanto, wich is better for this purpose. I hope that after 5 or 10 years it will be possible to use them. Any remark in a different language than English is not comprehensible for the rest of us. But here we are on an international site. And now for my co-nationals only : Va salut prieteni si va doresc sarbatori fericite!

Installed Programs zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

MERRY CHRISTMAS FRIEND IN EUROPE! English is already emerging as the international common language, not only in the EU but worldwide.

Making that official will be stepping on many, many toes, and will probably backfire, so not a good idea. It does matter in the EU institutions, like the EP. The translation from all languages into all languages costs a fortune. That would cut the number of combinations, like Estonian to Maltese or Latvian to Gaelic, enormously.

Installed Programs zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

The only place where an official language could be needed would be for European administrations. They need to be able to communicate freely to work efficiently, independently of the country of origin.

Other languages are also good as long as they are used as alternatives on the right level. Take Francophone countries, for example: why use English if all negotiating parties speak French? Why should english be our main language if the UK wants to leave? We should increase the importance of frech and german as the languages of the 2 most important countries.

Portable rus zte axon 7 vs samsung s7

Non si lamenta di questo? Why Italian people, whose language is less and less learnt, are they often the most enthusiastics forget and betray their own culture?

Do you know, that italian is a big looser in the EU institutions? I think that the REAL people of Italy (those, who do not succeed in learning english) is not so happy of english demination.

Only middle classes are. Nobody asks you, guys, to forget your own languages or learn other than English foreign languages…The real strength is in multilingualism!

The more languages you speak, the better you understand the world and the world understands you! Translation among 24 languages cost us millions and provokes serious misunderstanding. At best local languages would be used for social communication but not for serious topics such as legal, political, economic and academic interactions.

This would have 2 major unintended consequences: 1. Increased power to the native English speakers to the detriment of second-language English speakers. The inevitable death of at least some European languages over time. Paying millions to translators is preferable to paying millions to the elite English speakers who would take all the top positions; and better than throwing interpreters and translators out of work. Serious misunderstanding occurs much more readily when people struggle to express and comprehend discourse in a second or foreign language.

English is doing very well globally, thanks in part to the huge business of international English testing, with all that entails of language classes, teacher training and grader norming, not to mention the costs of the tests themselves. Please let Europe maintain its pole position in the language maintenance stakes!

And what about esperanto? Les gens croient savoir, mais ils sont souvent plus dans la foi aveugle que dans la connaissance.

But halp the people to learn 2 or more languages becomes reallistic, if esperanto is used for this purpose. English would make a fine third language.

Esperanto is the answer for second language learning in Hungary, Italy and Portugal. Well said, Neil, congratulations!

BUT in my opinion, if we had esperanto as a common language, the third one will not necessarily be english, but german, spanish, italian or… any language of Europe. Contrary to the widely-believed myth, the inherent difficulties of English grammar and the multiple meanings of countless words which can only be understood from knowing the context in which they are used make English a hard language for others to learn well. Further, adopting English would require just about everyone else in Europe to learn and accept incorrect meanings for words whose correct meanings they already know from their native languages, because lazy anglophones have perverted the English form of those words by habitually misusing them. What Europe needs instead is a new Latin, i. No language could fulfill that role better than Esperanto, which brilliantly combines attributes of the Germanic, Latinate and Slavic languages with traits found in many other languages.

We, citizens of Europe and of the world, call upon you to make Esperanto the 24th language of the European Union, for a Europe that is more democratic and more just with respect to every language and culture on the continent. Choosing Esperanto is another step in the construction of Europe.

There is a lack of debate at the European level. Europe must not be only an economic entity; it must be a Europe o