zte axon 7 us release


zte axon 7 us release


Ier to learn than English. I was just making a 60 years comparison between the two languages, but your clarification works even better against Esperanto, over one hundred and twenty years and it has only about two million speakers! English was taught massively in a lot of schools for more than 40 years, while esperanto is studied on a voluntary basis, by people who want a better world. It was imposed by force and trickery. Zte axon 7 cheap For a language based on the ideals of communication among peoples who do not belong to the elites of their countries, and without an army (of soldiers or advertising executives), Esperanto is actually very widely spoken. In order to control these territories, English speakers have had to resort to military might to invade and occupy them. Cheerio and all that, old chap! The conqueror always wants to eradicate opposition. England did it, France did it, Russia did it, Spain did it, China did it, Japan did it, Germany did it, the Arabs did it and so forth. But only the Americans are the bad guys. But at the risk of being boring and repetitive.



Those of you that think that teaching Esperanto to the billions that do not have any idea about its existence, because it easier that English, will have to justify to them the economic benefits they will reap through Esperanto, benefits that are more than obvious when they consider English, or even some other languages. Knowing Esperanto will not help them in finding a new job, a better paid one, and many other benefits they will accrue from learning English.


Include Custom zte axon 7 us release




I really admire the passion and eloquence Esperanto advocates defend the language. Many other things have been defended with equal or even more passion and eloquence, and in many cases with much more violence and ferocity, like Communism.



But when something does not produce a net benefit, which means more money, less expenses or both, it simply is not accepted, and if imposed eventually will be overcome. Just to part with a little suggestion, I would like for someone better informed than I appear to be to explain to me the multiple benefits, other that the ideological opposition to English (read Americans), Esperanto can provide the World at large. How much more money and investment will be lost if English is adopted instead of Esperanto.


Wipe Drives zte axon 7 us release




The way I see it, it does not matter how much or how loud the wolf howls to the mountain, in the end the mountain is not going to move and it will have to go away with its tail between its legs like a simple mutt. Do not blame the Americans, blame your own greediness and ambition. And that is what really irks English opponents, they are to blame as much as everybody else. I am pretty sure you have gain more benefits through English than through Esperanto.



You are French and nobody is more purist when it come to language that French, but French after being in the top of the World fell from grace to no other that the hated English. And yes, English have been taught in schools throughout the World for years while Esperanto has not but for good reasons, many of them. They are called dollars.


Wipe Drives zte axon 7 us release




But evolution is a bitch and is very difficult to predict, so who knows even though English is mighty and powerful today hoping against hope might take Esperanto to its rightful place, as the conqueror of all languages and the eradicator of all cultures without having to provided anything in its instead. But that is not going to happen in our watch, yours and mine, nor of those here more younger than us. It may take a few more years yet for the World to reach a consensus.



What you are not considering, you that oppose the English language so strenuously, is that the language may still prove to be your best ally, the more people that speak the language, who are not the hated Americans and Brits, the more noise against them will be made, in forums in which they participate, so they will hear the voices of their opponents, and nothing does more to unravel an Empire that the increasing number and volume of the opponents voices. That said, our leaders can see the bigger picture, right? There is not only one race, the Human Race, (so far we all come from the same origins, out of Africa) but eventually there will be only one language and one country.


Operations manager zte axon 7 us release




It is the only way to go the long way efficiently. Whether that language will be English is still for grabs, Spanish and Chinese have as good a chance, although I also believe that eventually English will prevail just out of practical reasons.



English which comprises of so many other languages, is like glue and can overtake all other languages. Thus, it by its very make-up, deserves to be the language that unifies Europe, like Latin did in its time. So, why not take the next step and make it the Official Language of the European Union? English shares thousands of words in common with other European languages, which come from Latin, Greek, Hebrew, etc. The result is that using English would require the roughly 1200 million people who speak these other languages to learn and accept INCORRECT meanings for thousands of words which they already understand correctly from their native languages.


Latest firmware zte axon 7 us release




The only thing which that could ever accomplish is chaos, so say that the spread of English would be entirely bad thing in every possible way. This article is misleading at best. These issues need to be debated in all their colors and nuances. They are suddenly not taken as seriously.



Farquhar seems very emotionally tied to English (British or our real English as spoken here in the USA? Otherwise he is also poorly informed about Esperanto. He should take it for a spin. He might actually enjoy the ride. I teach English and American culture to undocumented, highly educated immigrants and refugees here in the USA. No prob for that in Esperanto, dude! I am amazed at the zeal with which learners support English, while blissfully unaware of how bad their own English actually is. Sometimes it allows people to communicate, but mostly in a rather poor manner.


Latest firmware zte axon 7 us release




I was taught english, but I prefer esperanto. It hoodwinks learners into thinking that ELF is a separate variety from US or UK English.



If so, where is it? Where are its books, newspapers, TV stations? Which universities offer their courses in ELF? Normally people are also really bad at their original, mother language.


Original software zte axon 7 us release




Your personal lack of culture, education and proficiency in a language is not the fault of the language you choose to display said ignorance in. The stretch to which people defend something the perceive as good has nothing to do with their understanding of what they are defending. Sometimes, it is really a good thing and others it is not. Case in question, Esperanto.



It might be a good thing, or not, as a language, easy, universal and cosmopolite, but is it a good thing as a World language. English is spoken by over 400 million as a native language and for at least as many as second language, that puts it as the second most spoken language in the World, add to that all the, already in place, infrastructure: economic, social and political.



I there is not contest. English win the day, but if your distaste, aversion and envy of the English influence is so great that you cannot get past it, then obviously, Chinese, Spanish even French are a better choice than Esperanto.



And that is just the obvious. What do you think of this said by Claude Piron. Una casa mal construida se cae a pedazos.



Por eso, no tengo ninguna duda del porvenir del esperanto. Siento que el esperanto es una de esas cosas concretas fruto del bien. Y todo esto lo pagamos con impuestos.



Esos sistemas carecen de sentimientos. En una palabra, es bueno. Yo creo en el esperanto.



I, on the other hand, am providing you with new information. I have neither envy, distaste nor aversion to the English language, but I have a concern for linguistic justice which you do not appear to share. Achieving an efficient bridge language in Europe does not have to happen today or even during this

Комментарии