zte axon 7 size

Should have learned a couple of languages. Every country as well as every culture have the right to have their own language as an official language of the EU. English is one of the most-spoken languages in Europe and obviously people need to learn it. Indeed, those who have English as native language would be advantaged since they know this language better than anyone. Zte axon 7 cheap So the official language, if there must be one, must be neutral, such as Esperanto. In my experience the pronunciation and the grammar are easier for Slovaks than for French speakers, for instance. I have used Esperanto with people from almost every EU country (including Hungarians, whose language is very different from other European languages), Esperanto was easy for all of them. More than a century of use has proven that you can use Esperanto to write poetry and express love. If English is biased then ALL natural languages are biased!

Your logic is flawed, funny and febrile. If you spent more time learning English and NOT DEsperanto then maybe you could have understood my postings.

Portable rus zte axon 7 size

But we must consider which would be de consequences of the fact of being English the common language. It seems to me that this situation would make it difficult for people to feel themselves European.

Of course if we think from individual point of view, a person goes to Ebglish because of its world hegemony, but for Europe it would be a good investment to have its own and common language. British people are European too I believe.

Latest firmware zte axon 7 size

English is relatively easy to learn and is the worldwide dominant language for business. It would make working and business easier across European countries.

No, English should be the second language of Europe and used in situations where neither party speaks the others first language. Taking decisions like this would cotinue to strip Europe of its real identity, which is a continent of diversity, and would premote the idea that we are all one country.

Opinions and reviews zte axon 7 size

We are notAbsolutely not, there are 2 Anglophone nations in the EU, the biggest even considering an exit from the EU. Christos says that everyone should learn English as a 2nd language so that e. That would give a vast advantage to English speakers plus make them lazy and reluctant to integrate. Thank God this will never happen as France will never accept it and neither will Spain, which has 500 million speakers of its own language.

Only a small percentage of the people in the EU are English speakers so English is punching well beyond its weight. We need linguistic diversity.

Original software zte axon 7 size

Knowing a language enriches a person, helps them see the world from another perspective and aids intercultural understanding. Diversity in languges is brilliant and should always be promoted.

On another note, I understand that France and Spain would have a problem with English being forced into thier societ; as would we here in Belgium. But, the world is heading that way anyway, so it may just happen with or without our approval.

Opinions and reviews zte axon 7 size

Most of those favouring English, I notice, are those who speak minority languages. My favorite would be Dutch, there is lot of similarities to other European languages.

Lots of similar words with English, German, Scandinavian and even french languages.. So Dutch would be my choice, only thing what should be changed is the spelling.

How to update zte axon 7 size

Those throat g-s and else… Spell how you write it and this would be perfect. If we are to choose a common language to use within Europe, it should also be one that can be used in all Regions of the world. But life would be a little smoother if we shared one common way to communicate within Europe and, with the rest of the world. How should globalization and multinational teamwork take place without a common language?

So I think English should be taught every european child since primary school, to give young people a chance to advance an opinion all around the globe. If English would be the only official language, it would be kind of uprated compared to all the other languages. Why should all Europeans learn Esperanto?

Installed Programs zte axon 7 size

The important fact is, that English is the language of the internet. Everything is in English: tutorials, videos, all kind of debates, etc. If that happens, a lot of forums will be made just for Europeans in Esperanto and other forums would be in English.

Through globalization we can easily talk to people in Canada or Australia and learn about their lives and cultures, how they see the world from their perspective and what they think about Europe. Do they never use the Internet?

I think Europe would maybe unite with Esperanto as a language all Europeans speak, but on the contrary, they would isolate themselves from the rest of the world. If everyone speaks English, you can travel wherever you want and communicate with everyone there without any language barriers. Who is going to translate the internet to Esperanto for all the europeans?

My world would be very limited without understanding English, the global language. Why do you say that, on the internet, you can communicate in Esperanto only with Europeans?

In my experience of Esperanto chat rooms, Brazilians seem to be the majority (at least outnumbering any other single group), followed by Americans. Of course chat rooms are not a reliable indicator of the overall demographic, but I think it is significant that most of the users are from the Americas, not Europe, although there are plenty from there too. I am only going to say that Esperanto was created in 1887 and to this date more people learn Chinese in one year than Esperanto, and Chinese is a very difficult language to learn while Esperanto is tooted as the easier one. Presently there are over 500 million speakers of the English language, only outnumbered by the number of Chinese speakers.

The other eight languages in decreasing order of speakers are: Hindustani, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Bengali, Portuguese, Malay-Indonesia and French. The only practical alternatives to the generalization and adoption of English as the World (and European) language would be Mandarin or Spanish.

Who wants to learn Hindustani when more people speak English in India than any other local language. Mandarin is way to difficult, lacks an alphabet and a person needs to learn between 5 to 10 thousand symbols to be considered well educated.

Spanish is not as difficult as Chinese but still more difficult to learn than English. Just from a practical point of view English is way ahead of any other language.

Is there any other language out there that is as democratically represented as English is? The opposition to the adoption of English as a European (or of the World for that matter) unifying language is more based on political resentment than in practical considerations. Business, financial and scientific information is disseminated and published more often in English than in any other language and the only market larger than the English speaking one is the Chinese.

The way I see it is that no matter what the reasons of the spread of English in the World, presently, it is the most prevalent, spoken and understood language in the World and besides not being and overly difficult language to learn, it will be the best and easier choice from a practical standpoint. Nothing to do with politics and everything to do with creating a better World. Pro politikaj kialoj, kelkaj landoj preferas la malnovan (Tajvano, Singaporo, Hongkongo, ktp). Se mi ne multe legas, mia vortprovizo ne kreskas.

Jam tio estas giganta laboro. Post la lernado de la baza lingvo, oni povus uzi tempon por lerni la malnovan skribmanieron, la kromajn dialektojn, ktp. Kion vi opinias pri tio? It is clear that the European Union will never allow to impose the language of any member state as the only official language of Europe, no matter how dominant that language is in Europe or even in the rest of the world. In other words, the EU Commission does not recognize a language as international by its dominant position.

A language with dominant positi