zte axon 7 gorilla glass

E UK, at the expense of the rest of the world. Rob the poor to make the rich even richer! Now, either put up or shut up, as they say. Show us the money! It is a EU issue and the EU has TWENTY-FOUR official languages, any one of which is appropriate for a discussion on an EU issue. Zte axon 7 cheap Cu iu povas traduki? Mi diras ke la celo de la anglausonanoj estas detrui, mortigi, malperigi ciujn lingvojn por esti la majstrojn de la mondo. Homoj ne vidas tion kaj ne komprenas. Tiuj kiuj lernas la anglan ne komprenas ke la usonanoj trudigas de forte kaj ke ili ne lasas al ili la elekton do estas maldemokratia.

Mi vidas se mi havos respondon. Mi sendis ciujn paperojn kiujn mi havas sur la aviado kaj la problemoj de la angla en tiu specialajo, la neceso de shangi la lingvon de la aviado et ne al la angla cie kaj en ciuj landon ne usonanglaj.

Portable rus zte axon 7 gorilla glass

Estas vera ke la anglousonanoj volas detrui, mortigi, malperigi ciujn lingvojn ; ili trudigis ilian feston Halloween en Francio, ilian kulturon kaj malbonan magajon. La homoj kiuj lernas la anglan car oni ne lasas al ili la elekton, oni trudigas de forte. Mi vidos se mi havas respondon.

Se iu povas traduki, mi dankas. Uzu ni alian komunan lingvon, sed ne la anglan.

Startup zte axon 7 gorilla glass

Sorry Carlos, but Esperanto is not just better because Leo says so, or because I or anybody else says so, it is objectively better than English. I could give a vast number of examples, but I will just give three, to show what I mean. Esperanto has six participles; English has two. In this instance English needs almost 3 times as many letters to express the same thing as Esperanto, i. English is objectively less efficient.

That is not an opinion, it is a verifiable fact. All Esperanto parts of speech can be changed to other parts of speech in a regular manner. You need to learn each adjective separately from the noun, and many nouns have no corresponding adjective, such as aunt, cousin, hare, turkey.

Wipe Drives zte axon 7 gorilla glass

In Esperanto, all nouns, without exception, can be turned into adjectives simply by changing the final - o, with which all nouns end, to - a. Every adjective, without exception, in Esperanto can be converted into a verb, regularly, e. You have exceptions in English, and you have to learn each exception separately, slowly, laboriously, by trial and error. In Esperanto you simply learn the rule, which is universally applicable. So Esperanto can express, and far more concisely, everything that English can express.

But English has gaps, as is apparent from the above examples. Therefore English cannot express everything which Esperanto can. Your idea that most people have chosen English instead of Esperanto is completely false. They have chosen English because they do not know of the advantages of Esperanto.

Portable rus zte axon 7 gorilla glass

How many non-speakers of Esperanto are aware of the advantages which I have just described? It is you, and not Leo, who is comparing apples and cats. You compare a language supported by the astronomic power, money and military might of the English-speaking world with a language which has none of these advantages, and which is growing because of its intrinsic, linguistic merits, and nothing else. Another huge advantage which Esperanto has over English is the fact that Esperanto is comprised of invariant roots and affixes which can be freely combined to express any desired meaning.

This is a huge advantage since it means that in Esperanto, words with related meanings are syntactically related too and therefore more easily understood. Though I strongly disliked mal - at first, in time I came to see that contra Orwell and his fictional Newspeak, mal - adds precision rather than reducing it. Of coarse he will find the comparison of qualities irrelevant.

Latest firmware zte axon 7 gorilla glass

You defend posting a question in English. Who putted it and why it is putted it is not relevant for you. For what it will be used afterwards is probably also not relevant for you. If there is an announcement by the European Commission only in English about hiring employees, this probably also does not matter for you. In my simple mind it is a disrespect to the founding treaty of the EU. Good for you Esperantists!

As I have said repeatedly. All of that is irrelevant.

Operations manager zte axon 7 gorilla glass

People are still choosing English over Esperanto. It makes you look intelligent.

How come you fail so miserably when confronted with numbers. When you are confronted with numbers, real numbers, then the best way to fight it is to gang on in the individual presenting the numbers.

Wipe Drives zte axon 7 gorilla glass

I know I am right when being only one, and you being several, Riain, Leo, Framptono, Lambert, Mosier, etc. It DOES NOT matter that Esperanto is easier, more regular, more understandable, more analytical, more agglutinative, etc. It DOES NOT matter if the World will be a better place 100 years from now if Esperanto were to be implemented as the World Language. It will happen anyhow with whatever language become the World Language.

Be it English, German, French, Spanish or Chinese. Once everybody speaks the same language things will be better.

Esperanto is not a language that has passed the test of being spoken freely, regularly and uniquely, in a non-controlled environment, by a diverse group of people, including illiterate and uneducated people, intent in using the language for their own purposes, changing or giving new meaning to words, or inventing new one as they go. Esperanto will remain after that. Esperanto is spoken only by people who has a certain level of education and after learning it use it only to communicate with similar people. Give Esperanto to the illiterate, to the uneducated masses, to the people of different countries with different backgrounds and cultures, and watch what happens.

If you do with any language, English, Spanish, German, French, Chinese, etc. After a number of years everybody will have the same footing. The advantage you claim the speakers of a particular language have over others who do not speak the language is eliminated.

But with any of the languages which could possibly be considered for the task, you will have the advantage of starting with a lot more speakers (less people to teach) and a bigger infrastructure (less things to do, less money to spend, less teachers to train) so you will get there sooner with less effort. The only thing I have said English has in its favor is that: — It is the language most spoken as a second language.

So Esperanto is easier, and you can make verbs with any adjective, bla, bla, bla. Let Esperanto beat the aforementioned. And, do not stop beating your drums, you are the only ones dancing to their tune. The question was posted in English because it is the most spoken language in EU. Not politically, not culturally, but administratively.

Of course, you and I know that once one language is spoken in all the countries, by all the people in World that will affect detrimentally all other languages. Whether it is English, German, French, Spanish, Chinese, Russian or Esperanto.

But the question was not if English should become the only language in the World, nor was it if Esperanto was a better language than English. So you guys are completely off track. Leave Esperanto out, it is not relevant to this debate.

If you want to talk about Esperanto in any capacity, post a question and create a debate. If you want to debate this point in another language, post the question in that language.

And Mosier, you can get very good results and a quick and lasting agreement by sticking a bunch of people that speak 24 different languages in a room and expect them to understand each other. The invariability of morphemes, and the fact that they can also be used as independent words, gives Esperanto a lot in common with Mandarin Chinese. In most languages you have to memorise each of these words separately.

Esperanto, however, provides a clear system, which is also valid for all other animals. Jes, se ni volas la monopolan lingvan solvon kia estis la rusa en eksa Sovetio.

Even as a native speaker of English, I do not think that English should be the o