zte axon 7 akm

Nly official language in the EU. Although translating documents and interpreting in 24 languages is very expensive, not doing so would be extremely unfair and undemocratic. In the future, if there should be only one official language in the EU I would opt for Esperanto. It is much easier to learn than other languages and it does not belong to any one country in particular; it is neutral. Zte axon 7 cheap Obviously it could not be introduced tomorrow or next year, because there are not enough of us that speak it yet. However if it were introduced as the first foreign language in all European schools, I am convinced that within the next 25 years it would be a realistic option. I myself learned English and several other languages, among them Esperanto. I may attest about my experience, I suppose, even if it is irrelevant for you. My answer to your asking I gave already a long time ago… even in English.

Sorry, if it does not make you happy. Mi mem lernis kaj la anglan kaj plurajn aliajn lingvojn, inter kiuj Esperanton. Leo you can NOT read in my words ANY MEANING you want, they have a specific meaning.

Include Custom zte axon 7 akm

What I want to say, not what you decide to ascribe to them. The arguments you Esperantists are putting forward may or may not be relevant in a Debate about Esperanto as the only official language in the UE. Or in one about which is the best language in the World for a particular use, or even in other debates. This is a debate about deciding if English should or should not become the only official language in the EU. The question have nothing to do with German, Spanish or French, or even Esperanto, or any other language being better suited or having a greater right to become such unique official language.

Now from all the things you and others like you, have said here I understand you do not think that is a good idea. I encourage you, and anyone else who feels so inclined, to post other questions dealing with the subject you are interested in. I will suggest a few of the possible questions. If so, which one? Also you could post the questions in all 24 official languages of the Union and have debates in those languages.

Operations manager zte axon 7 akm

If I ask you your name in a language and you respond in another, we are NOT going to be able to communicate. If I ask you your name and you answer that you like carrots, we are not going to communicate either.

If we want to reach a concensus but each one of us speak in a different language, we are NOT going to reach an agreement. Maybe a good and viable idea 150 years ago when it was posted for the first time but not really as good now. I am just saying it because of the conversation you and other Esperantist have been having with me. I think the disagreement is not around numbers, but around time perspective.

Original software zte axon 7 akm

That would be a huge volume of waste. Whatever way you are proposing to make Esperanto reach every human being in the planet and become the Universal Second Language of the World, if you do so with English you will get there sooner, and with less expenditure of time and money, but only if you do it with English. Of course you do not agree because with Esperanto you ONLY have to teach it to the teachers needed to teach the rest of the World, You have to teach it to the rest of the World, the only difference is that you have to teach it to an additional billion people.

And sure, it is irrelevant that everything have to be translated to Esperanto, although it is already in English, and that you will need to train the translators who will do the work. Sorry, I forgot that you are going to do all that so that people could learn many other languages given the propaedeutical properties of Esperanto that make learning another language, after having learned Esperanto, much more easier. And very important, without compulsion, coercion or subsidy from their governments or the Americans, or the English, or of any other group of people who are English native speakers.

Popular zte axon 7 akm

But as I told Leo, this is relevant in another debate, not in this one. No, it does not! Once you are there, you ARE THERE, no need for additional expenditures. No more than with any other language.

Everybody speaks English, English is taught in all schools, etc. Arriving at the point of a fully established international language, then the setup costs fall, the infrastructure and initial translations and all the terminology are in place (English is doing really well here, Esperanto is positive but still has a way to go). The costs of Esperanto in this long phase are not zero, but are significantly less than those of English. English could reduce its costs by being taught very early or even as a mother tongue globally, but that defeats the aim of multilingualism that Esperantists share with Europeans.

Installed Programs zte axon 7 akm

If English became the only official language of the EU now, then that would effectively lock down the solution to the language problem, which would be a real shame as a lower cost, higher fluency, multilingual friendly solution does exist, if given some basic support and a few decades of patient investment. So it seem that we are almost in sync regarding the problem and its social and financial outcome and significance.

Except that from my point of view, English being so way ahead, will in the long run till the balance in its favor. The rest, although also speculative, can be accepted as a given. If you live in the US, although now you can experience the same almost everywhere, you will find that from the second and third generation, many do not know how to speak the language of their ancestors creating serious identity problems within families. And contrary to what many people want you to believe, at least the way I see it, it will not obliterate other cultures, they are just going to be chanting in a different language.

Last update zte axon 7 akm

Although in many cases there will be an amalgamation. The way I see it is that regardless of which language, if one language is adopted as a World language, whether as a second or the sole language, it will contribute to the betterment of Mankind, allowing people to comunicarte with and understand each other better.

Also, it will work against the local language since with time people will stop needing their original language to do anything they need to do. Whatever neutrality you ascribe to the language originally will be lost after a few years. And my final point is that meanwhile people find English more useful, they will keep choosing it, at least maintaining the advantage if not increasing it. So unless you resort to some drastic measures, you will always have more English speakers. And the support and patience will also work wonders with English.

Portable rus zte axon 7 akm

English has failed: it is too difficult to learn because of its absurd phonetics and the EU citizens tend to use it mostly on holidays. Like it or not, the EU will never be part of the Anglosphere.

There are about 507 million people in the EU. That means there are over 35 million of Europeans who speak English well. How many speak Esperanto. If English have failed with 35 million English speaking Europeans.

How do you define the performance of Esperanto. About two million in the whole World. Who is ignoring the data? Phobia: persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it. I am not an Esperanto-phobe, but I am a stupid-phobe. It is very stupid to try to make something into what it is not to try to ridicule your opponent.

That is something that Esperantists in this debate, which by the way is not about Esperanto, has frequently resorted to when short of decent arguments. Just because you do not have arguments to defend your position in a debate does make your opponent an evil person nor does it diminish the merits of his arguments.

And if we are going to use the definition you have posted then you are using the word incorrectly because it is very evident that I was not nor am not trying to avoid Esperanto or talking about it. I personally have nothing against Esperanto n